01 Create the arbitration meeting
Set the date window, allowed hours, duration, and the participants whose availability matters.
Arbitration scheduling can involve the arbitrator, case manager, counsel for each side, party representatives, and expert witnesses. AgreeOnTime gives the organizer one private page to collect availability, see who has replied, and confirm a workable time without restarting the process every time one participant cannot attend.
Arbitration scheduling often crosses organizations, legal teams, and calendars that cannot simply be shared. One side may be available while the other is not, an arbitrator may have limited windows, and an expert witness may only be needed for a specific session.
When replies arrive across separate emails, the case manager or organizer has to reconstruct the answer manually and keep asking until a time survives every required participant.
AgreeOnTime keeps availability collection private and organizer-led. Participants can describe what works in normal language, while the organizer sees who replied, who is still missing, and which options remain realistic.
That helps the scheduling process move forward without turning availability into a public grid or a long chain of re-checking.
People commonly involved in this kind of meeting include:
The organizer can collect availability from all necessary participants in one place, while keeping individual replies private. Missing responses stay visible, so the organizer can follow up precisely instead of asking everyone again.
AgreeOnTime supports the practical coordination work behind arbitration scheduling: gather constraints, compare realistic windows, and confirm only when the required people are accounted for.
Set the date window, allowed hours, duration, and the participants whose availability matters.
Share the page with the arbitrator, case manager, counsel, party representatives, or experts.
Participants describe what works without publishing availability to the whole group.
Review who replied, who is missing, and which option can work before sending the final time.
Not really. Calendly is strongest when one person's availability is the center of the process. AgreeOnTime is built for one organizer coordinating several people.
Yes. That is one of the main situations where AgreeOnTime is useful.
No. Replies stay private to the organizer.
Yes. You can include the arbitrator, case manager, counsel, party representatives, experts, and other invited participants.
The final time should only be treated as set after the required participants have responded and the organizer sends confirmation.
Create one private meeting page, collect availability from the required participants, and confirm a realistic time with fewer repeated follow-ups.
Create a free arbitration meeting